viOlet vs MajOr

Why don't Zerg use more static defense like Violet? It has GOT to be more cost effective than all those losses of drones, and zerglings running in one at a time getting fried trying to defend. And what is the cost of being forced to try and defend instead of having your units attacking on your opponent's side of the map? Spores and spines are like having an increased supply limit.



I adopted a cat that is so shy that he literally lives in my bathroom cabinet. He only comes out when I play sc2 replays. I have tested this hypothesis time and time again: play a sc2 replay, and he'll come out. how hilarious?



I couldn't agree more, with 1, not so sure about the cat thing.

I build 2 spores and 2 spines in each mineral line bare minimum the second I know medivacs are on the field. Terrans build tons of turrets when they see a Muta, why don't zergs do the same about drops which are just as dangerous.



it's not that simple at all (building mass static d).

zerg has 3 bases pretty early, so you need a lot of static d to be safe. It's hard not to get steamrolled if you use 6-10 drones on static d (lower econ) and lots of minerals!

lots of static d loses to aggressive terran builds with skilled pushes.

major's problem was he sacraficed a lot of units with failed drops. when he saw the mass static d he would have been better off forgetting drops and limiting creep and/or doing a frontal assault, or macroing hard.



21 minute timing attack by violet. nice.



God I wish my ladder games looked like this.

new comment
Only registered and logged in users can post comments.