Scarlett vs qxc

I mean, game 2 just shows what is wrong with Zerg, and I'm not saying this as a balance issue... it's more of a 'is it fun to watch?' issue...



It is interesting to see such super-late game SH strategies being used recently. I actually find them enjoying for the most part, however both players can play too timidly for my liking. Qxc should've done something, anything, meanwhile Scarlett could've A-moved and won. Anyways, swarm host is awesome, suck it enemies of the zerg :)



I find the viper and infestor use fun to watch. And this is more fun to watch than turtletoss until unbeatable deathball or terrans that get 3 bases and simply make marines until the opponent dies



Wow, I have never heard so much BM from casters. That game was incredibly long and monotonous and, sure, painful to watch given qxc's position. But given that 99.9% of players would have fared far worse, some manner seems in order. Other casters would have found ways to analyze or just fill the relatively dead time with jokes that weren't at a player's expense.



@ #4

I would usually agree, and I've been a qxc fan since beta, but seriously.. No YAMATOs for 15solid minutes. Late game Terran Air/Tank army is only killable when the Terran doesn't know how to use it.

He could have been pushing SH with tanks under DD that entire time, and wasn't/didn't. That's why he lost.

new comment
Only registered and logged in users can post comments.