NesTea vs LoveTT

Stalker/Colossi are just so strong...



Nice to see a toss player win one! It seems so rare on this site lately



baker had extremley good micro w/ his collasi and stalker/sentry.. nes couldnt get close enuff w/ those roaches to do anytihng. gj baker



gg



sentry imba! ^^



going back in when the sentries had energy left for ff lost nestea that fight, disappointing.



really cool build from baker: those air units worked really well in pinning back nestea for ages, stopping any further expos (hence nestea's in-base hatch), allowing his own gold to get up, and forcing nestea to get hydras (which melt vs. colossi).



Fucking clever and well executed; nothing to do with how strong colossi or sentries are. Colossi are so hard to get and so fragile (nestea could have put way more pressure on to slow down colossi production and expansion rate).



Sentries are seriously good though, but micro intensive and actually protoss really needs them to limit the mobility of zerg and terran, which would otherwise completely overwhelm protoss.



f off baker



collosi in those numbers will never be beaten by a ground army...



lol.. too bad army position, composition, and tech were bad.



Neural Parasite is becoming a norm to fend off multi collosi builds. Especially when the game has become based on economics, it's almost certain your opponent will go T3 sooner than usual.



the air was a good move, it got Nes to go Hydra but baker went colossi instead.



I'm starting to agree with day[9] that getting colossi much much later, and squeezing a lot more out of the earlier tech, is a really strong option. It let's protoss expand more, see more, and blindly turtle less. nice.



what's with that much of thumbs up? boring macro game and final humiliating encounter, why thumb up this?



EtdJBaker is probably better known as LoveTT.



Antimage Style ?



@Luqe, is that trolling, or are you genuinely that stupid?

new comment
Only registered and logged in users can post comments.