aLive vs ROOT_herO

how could alive win this? protoss has much more strenht of army, versatility in builds and more mobility....
As terran u need arround 30 to 40 armysupply more than toss and even bases, toss can be 1 base ahead at most.
i dont say that the balance is completely off, but when considering fun and versatility ... terran is the weakest race of all three. Just look at what terran build since sc2 came out: MMM! thats ist. everithying else was nerfed to unplayability. sad




I find adept/phoenix games kind of boring and repetitive, but herO does execute it to perfection.

Game 5 was great



tvp so boring in LOTV. I almost fell asleep watching. Rather watch roach vs. roach. Tastosis constantly screaming these games are so good doesn't actually make them good.

@TwoLight Problem has always been that the marine is too effective and cost efficient, so marine buffed anything else is too powerful. The marine should have been nerfed way back in WoL and everything else buffed in return. But we are several years and two expansions past that point, that ship sailed long ago. This is what SC2 is unfortunately. They obviously gave up on design and just gave Protoss the adept, which makes Protoss as one-dimensional and boring as Terran. Just mass adept vs. mass marine zzZZzz.

It is sad when the no micro a-move race Zerg is way more entertaining. This entire tourney would have sucked if it weren't for the Zerg players putting on a good show.



At least he won a game with more than two unit types in his comp.

@ #1) For a long time in 2016 Terran was considered incredibly stronger than protoss, but that changed as protoss learned to adapt and play around the heavy harass style followed by an insanely strong push across the map.
And terran is far stronger than zerg for all the reasons you named toss > terran. I would not put terran as the weakest race in this current meta.



g4 is good

new comment
Only registered and logged in users can post comments.