Destiny vs ST_Rainbow

how many fungals does it take to kill a fucking battlecruiser...

when Rainbow scanned all 3 bases @ 14:00, he was scanning for the spire that was not put down... I wouldve continued to make battlecruisers too! seriously.



Is destiny listening to the Death Note soundtrack at the end of game 2?



I'm Zerg, but I hate the fact that every race has an ultimate unit that can attack air and ground except Zerg. We just have these damn Ultralisk that can't do anything when it comes to air. It will take a ton of Hydralisk to kill a BC or a ton of Muta or a few corruptors. The BC is more cost effective than what the Zerg can make to kill it. Now the Protoss ultimate units such as Carriers and Mothership can be killed pretty easily with the Zerg units. I'm just saying that the Terran BC is a bit to OP. If not nerf the BC some make the Ultralisk have like a thorny back to attack air. So whenever they walk under air they are scrapping the air units. I don't know! ¯,○.o,/¯



Zerg has worst scouting - stupid Overlord in the beginnig. Ok oversir in the middle.

Terran has -
1. Fastest scan
2. Raven (have not seen it pretty long though)
3. Volant buildings with 1500 hitpoints
4.

Zerg has worst akward units in the game - Corruptors, Broodlords, Ultralisks.

I always admire people like Destiny who's chosen a Zerg to play.

Zerg needs -
1. Scoudges from 1st SC for antiair
2. Something like Lurker with splash damage to protect bases
3. Changeling should have an ability to bury and twice more livetime







Love Destiny, but he was straight up out classed in these 2 games.



Supernova +1

Terran was constantly knew what destiny was up to.

I have never watch ST Rainbow play before but they sure do know how to crush a great zerg player.

I am going to see if there are any replays where ST Rainbow play idra.



I love how #4 called BC OP lol. they suck balls and were only useful because destiny wasn't ready for them and refused to make anything other than festors to counter them (corruptor or hydra?).

they're like BL (except worse) where you can surprise someone with them, but then you usually have to tech switch off of them.



HMstarcraft. zerg units don't have to be as multidimensional. when it's later in the game you can just tech switch and own massive units like BC/carrier with corruptors, etc, unless you're totally caught off guard.

terran is very very slow to tech switch. if 10 mutas pop and all you have is marauders you lost obviously lol.



@x10unit1 - yep. T knew that destiny was being stubborn with his infestors. Had destiny thrown down a spire for 200/200 and made a few corruptors, he couldve stopped the BC production. The number of 150/150 infestors that he wasted this game was ridiculous and STRainbow knew it. He also knew that destiny had no mobile scouting/harass unit (aka mutalisks), so he expo'd all over the map.

I love destiny, but although his infestor play is awesome, hes starting to be coined by that play, and his opponents are abusing it.. Just like idra's macro play and how everyone would just abuse his early game vulnerability.



I honestly dont think that destiny is outclassed, he just needs to work on his decision making



If you think ultralisks are bad, no wonder you think Terran is op. And I feel Ling/infestor is much worse than ling/b/muta, sorry Destiny. I know you said you think mutas capitalize only on opponents mistakes, but it forces them to push slowly and get turrets, which allows you to expand. Infestors also don't deal with siege tanks at all, but bad terrans don't make tanks anyways so infestors work most of the time ;/



game 2 is amazing

new comment
Only registered and logged in users can post comments.