Huk vs IdrA

I gather the early quits are the reason for the thumbs down. Not to be deterred - HuK's play in game 2 deserves viewing.



#1 - bingo.



well played by hujk
idra could have done a lot better, taking so many extra canon shots when fighting the first propes




EGIdra's early game (in game 2) is PATHETIC. That few roaches that late has just proven that he is nothing but a big game, macro player.

no excuse for the weak of a roach bust against an early expoing protoss.



could have done a lot more even with those too few roaches. he had 7 roaches huk had 1 stalker and a zealot and no canon covering the nexus left side. could have had the nexus walk away and double expand, or something. even with the void rays coming could have been in okay position. sometimes i dont understand how you can be that stellar in your macro play and throw away units by making bad decisions and engagements that easily.



To #4, um... he made a 20 supply roach warren for the 4-7 roach push. He sacrificed numbers for an earlier push, but if protoss has 2 cannons or stalkers it's pretty much shut down if the buildings are placed well.

Huk had a stalker, and eventually 2. There was no way Idra could just pick off areas uncovered by cannons.

Please, don't talk if you don't know what you are talking about.



Nothing but a 'big game macro player'. That doesn't sound too bad of a description in SC2.. Haters gonna hate.



people above trying to critique idra are fucking retarded. If your gonna give your opinion just make sure you know what your talking about before hand so you don't look like a moron.



Couldn't IdrA have carried on in Game 2? Some transition?

new comment
Only registered and logged in users can post comments.